The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing
The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing
Blog Article
III) Inside the version from the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Model) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed for the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity in the offense demands the most stringent punishment, thinking about the sanctity of human life and deterrence for possible offenders.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of in the future while in the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness from the alleged occurrence plus the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred being the real brothers of the deceased but they did not respond at all on the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a lot of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused is actually a weak sort of evidence which could be manoeuvred with the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners together over a motorcycle at 4.
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons having their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced on the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
Please use 1 username and password established from the options. If it does not work please try out the other. Each allows single consumer access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.
only to the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only on the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Some pluralist systems, like Scots legislation in Scotland and types of civil regulation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, do not precisely healthy into the dual common-civil regulation system classifications. These types of systems could have been heavily influenced via the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive regulation is firmly rooted while in the civil regulation tradition.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the assorted decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences might not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the law website is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
When the petitioner is just present in the place of occurrence without causing any injury to your deceased or PWs then in these kinds of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided with the realized trial Court after recording in the evidence.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for instance self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may perhaps lead to reduced charges or acquittal.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Until case is experimented with(Bail Matters)
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter like a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) from the Pakistan Constitution provides original jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to acquire up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.